this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
62 points (89.7% liked)
Games
26060 readers
37 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I see how it exists for "Diablo II: Resurrected," but how do people who own the original version of the game get it?
(Not that I plan to pay Blizzard any more money -- I've been boycotting them since not long after Diablo II came out the first time -- but I still gotta ask for curiosity's sake.)
I can’t tell if you’re kidding, but just in case: this is for the 2021 remastered version. They’re not making new paid content for a game that came out in 2000.
So the headline is a lie. Diablo II isn't getting its first expansion in 25 years. The Diablo II Remaster is getting its first expansion.
Correct. This was a contention of mine in another thread. Not the first click bait article I've seen about it and they all say the same fucking thing. I wouldn't be surprised if Blizzard sent out a marketing packet for these people to "publish."
The article is a bit unclear about it, but the article does say it's for the remastered version. So their headline is misleading, and OP just used the official article title.
So it's a bad title. Unfortunately it's poor form and considered misleading to change an article's headline. Still, OP should have noted that the headline straight-up lies.