this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
239 points (96.9% liked)

Mildly Interesting

25566 readers
308 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sergio@piefed.social 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Kind of a weird graph....

  • the "percentage of US adults who has a college degree" is on a scale of all US adults
  • the "percentage of US adults who get their news from a given source" is on a scale of all US adults with college degrees

But they're shown on the same bar graph, which implies they're shown on the same scale. Right? or am I misreading this?

[–] hesh@quokk.au 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's not "what % of college graduates get their news from this source", it's "what % of adults that get their news from this source have a college degree"

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

OK you're right. the scales are:

  • on a scale of all US adults, the percentage who have a college degree
  • on a scale of all readers who primarily get their news from (given magazine), the percentage who have a college degree

So the scales are still different.

I'm guessing they'd make an argument that: "If the college graduate readership were distributed evenly across all news sources, then (given magazine) would have (the percentage of all US adults who have a college degree)." But the labels don't say that, which is why it is confusing.

[–] hesh@quokk.au 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Imagine "All Americans" as one of the bars like the others - its just another cohort.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

is on a scale of all US adults with college degrees

no, "Among US adults who regularly get news from ____, % who hav ea bachelor's degree or more," not all US adults with a degree, just all adults

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 1 points 3 weeks ago

OK you're right. the scales are:

  • on a scale of all US adults, the percentage who have a college degree
  • on a scale of all readers who primarily get their news from (given magazine), the percentage who have a college degree

So the scales are still different.

I'm guessing they'd make an argument that: "If the college graduate readership were distributed evenly across all news sources, then (given magazine) would have (the percentage of all US adults who have a college degree)." But the labels don't say that, which is why it is confusing.