this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
37 points (100.0% liked)
news
754 readers
981 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You shouldn't read my message literally. I just meant the worst and cheapest lawyers whose presence will just be a formality, not a real help.
That is already how public defenders work.
seconding this: Ontario, Canada, removed the "duty counsel" obligation from competent working lawyers, & gave that work to lawyers who couldn't compete as real lawyers ( based on both experience & background information given me by other lawyers ), & now you get "duty counsel" which WON'T DO THEIR ACTUAL JOB, so people who SHOULD have all charges dismissed, don't get that, unless we hire a REAL lawyer, because the public-defenders won't do what they're supposed to do.
Idiocy.
& the whole industry of getting people convicted because they couldn't afford a real lawyer .. why should any jurisdiction which has integrity & LivingValues be doing that??
Obviously, just part of selling-out-more-completely, .. bah.
Criminally-irresponsible "management" of our legal-system, in my view.
_ /\ _