this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
391 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

80478 readers
3583 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a blog post, Musk said the acquisition was warranted because global electricity demand for AI cannot be met with “terrestrial solutions,” and Silicon Valley will soon need to build data centers in space to power its AI ambitions.

This dumb fuck. Unfortunately, his boosters will be all-in on this messaging. Whatever.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The government will not let SpaceX fail, it’s a strategic asset and Musk knows this. He is going to tie his Xai to it and saddle it with all the debt it is incurring. When the AI bubble pops he will be able to ask for bail outs to keep SpaceX afloat.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Companies that are too big to fail and need a bail out, should be automatically nationalised.

[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

*Automatically nationalized and leadership at those companies should be investigated and tried for fraud.

These CEOs need to take accountability not a golden parachute. They know when a business is failing and when they are defrauding investors and the public.

[–] AnonKingfisher@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"B-b-but that will stifle innovation!"

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

It will most certainly stifle innovative ways to leech more profit while the taxpayer is left holding the bag.

Ah, who am I kidding? They'll find something new. It will just spark more innovation.

[–] bebabalula@feddit.dk 6 points 1 day ago

Ding ding ding!

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That the reason behind all the AI datacenters in space hubub? Makes sense. The usual "subsidize the losses" strategy.

[–] swicano@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

I could have seen the opposite, too, where xAI pays spaceX gobs of money for tons of datacenter launches in advance, bubble pops, xAI goes under and spaceX still has the money. But ya I think this is "the govt won't let spaceX fail, pile all the riskiest shit into that"