this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
338 points (94.0% liked)
Technology
79983 readers
3473 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Lmfao, you're literally trying to pull a Goodwill Hunting? Bruh we've seen this movie ๐
How about you explain precisely what information is asymmetric and what they're solving by demanding an exorbitant 30% fee?
You're the one claiming to be the economics expert. I'm simply correcting the record.
Lmfao, this is the fastest I've ever seen an attempted Goodwill Hunting fall on its face.
You have literally no idea what you even asked.
Are you actually confused about the information asymmetry in video game purchases? Given your weird movie references I assumed you were just trying to change the topic.
I'll try to use small words. Before you play a game, you don't know if it's goo;, just as used car buyers don't know if the used car is a lemon. Without a buyer protections that drags the price of good games down just as lemons drag down the price of used cars. Akerlof goes into the proof for the car part of this in his paper.
"Lemon laws" mostly solve that problem for cars. Steam mostly solves that problem for video games. That requires trust. You may not trust Steam but millions of people do. They've repeatedly made decisions that benefit gamers so gamers flock to them. Thats why they buy so many games from Steam even when they're available elsewhere. If they broke that trust they'd probably never get it back but, until then, their net effect is to increase revenue for studios by providing a market where people are comfortable enough to spend more money.
Lmfao, here's smaller words big brain:
Steam has reviews and accepts returns.
๐ Congratulations.
Amazing.
How unique.
Now answer how their 30% fee of every single game's revenue is justified based on their costs to prove that they're not abusing their monopoly.
Oh, what is that? Every competitive app storefront everywhere, charging far less then that?
Congratulations on defending a billionaire's monopoly.
There's simple and there's oversimplified. The element your missing is "trust". The reason gamers go to Steam is because we trust their reviews and return policies.
The other storefronts haven't built that trust. Most gamers have the experience of trying other storefronts, hating them, and going back to Steam.
People don't trust Gabe because he's a billionaire, they trust him because he consistently makes decisions that gamers benefit from. No other game store CEO can claim that with a straight face.