Linux

11706 readers

481 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

101

Rust Coreutils Continues Working Toward 100% GNU Compatibility, Proving Trolls Wrong (www.phoronix.com)

submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@digipres.cafe to c/linux@programming.dev

92 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Sylvestre Ledru who serves as the lead developer of the uutils project for the Rust Coreutils implementation presented at FOSDEM 2026 this weekend on this initiative. Ledru has spoken at FOSDEM in prior years on Rust Coreutils and this year's talk focused primarily on Ubuntu 25.10's adoption of it in place of GNU Coreutils.

Ledru's presentation covered the progress made on Rust Coreutils in recent times and Ubuntu 25.10's uptake of Rust Coreutils and continuing that for Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. While some bugs have been found as a result of it, they have been fixed rather quickly. Ledru's presentation also points out some of the popular trolling around Rust Coreutils and ultimately how many of those commenters have been proven wrong

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay, but if the developers of uutils do not care about these things, and they would be the ones most hurt because they would not get access to the changes that others are making... why should the rest of us make a big deal over it?

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Because we are users, contributors, packagers, distributors... and if the project is unsustainable and suddenly becomes proprietary that is bad.

Or if the project is included in proprietary systems. Nobody will have the right to get source code then, or in case of GPLv3 even the right to install other software.

Copyleft and GPLv3 grant users the rights to prevent e-waste or replace shitty proprietary software on useful hardware with better one.

Copyleft licenses spread these rights, while permissive ones do nothing apart from handing out software for nothing in return.

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 0 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

So, in your opinion, should these developers simply stop their work on this project of they are not willing to use the GPL?

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

No, but as they do great work it is a shame that they dont protect it and thereby reduce the protection of every distro shipping them

[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 1 points 10 hours ago

Fair enough. I do actually get the concern, though I think that the threat is being exaggerated. However, I would argue that, if the goal is not to try and get these developers to abandon their efforts, then it does not make sense for every single discussion to get flooded with the same complaints about the license to the point that not much else seems to get talked about.