this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
28 points (91.2% liked)
Aviation
579 readers
11 users here now
Anything related to aircraft, airplanes, aviation and flying. Helicopters & rotorcraft, airships, balloons, paragliders, winged suits and anything that sustains you in the air is acceptable to post here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They're claiming 20% more fuel efficiency which would be huge, but at the expense of a metric fuck load of moving parts. Also who the fuck knows that happens if you have to make a gear up landing with these things
How many more moving parts than a conventional turbofan? Maybe four gears and a rotor?
Uh all of those blades, including the fixed ones, are variable pitch. Every single blade has several precision moving parts
This thing looks like it has less moving paths than a normal turbofan... Look at cutouts of the CFM56, easily available online.
Tarmac will definitely be closed for a while
There would probably be less damage than from a conventional turbofan hitting it - the blades would shatter rather than the cowling digging in.
Metal confetti to celebrate