this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
106 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

3568 readers
357 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The recent federal raid on the home of Washington Post reporter Hannah Natanson isn’t merely an attack by the Trump administration on the free press. It’s also a warning to anyone with a smartphone.

Included in the search and seizure warrant for the raid on Natanson’s home is a section titled “Biometric Unlock,” which explicitly authorized law enforcement personnel to obtain Natanson’s phone and both hold the device in front of her face and to forcibly use her fingers to unlock it. In other words, a judge gave the FBI permission to attempt to bypass biometrics: the convenient shortcuts that let you unlock your phone by scanning your fingerprint or face.-

It is not clear if Natanson used biometric authentication on her devices, or if the law enforcement personnel attempted to use her face or fingers to unlock her devices. Natanson and the Washington Post did not respond to multiple requests for comment. The FBI declined to comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hector@lemmy.today 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As I understand it even the alphanumeric passcodes they can break with password guessing, they make Limitless clones of the phone encryption bit so it getting shut down after a certain number of attempts doesn't stop them from Limitless guesses until they get it.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 4 points 1 day ago

This is why folks need to use encrypted keys + binary paraphrases (p¶), so you can insert as many Unicode characters as you want as your p¶.

Too bad not many 📱manufactures require a dedicated SD key slot for digital keys.