this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
718 points (99.4% liked)

World News

52236 readers
2569 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Toyota, Progressive Insurance, and a data analytics firm are now being accused of collecting detailed personal driving information without proper consent

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 97 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Time to make data sharing illegal. If it is technically needed, the industry needs to have a written contract with the user, which describes in detail which data is shared. It must be a separate contract from anything else, and one each for each industry partner.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

"T&Cs update : please agree to 80 pages of impenetrable legal jargon before you can continue to use your vehicle"

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

That's why I say it must be a written, separate contract. And not signing it must be without consequences regarding other contractual obligations.

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Notarized. The agreements need to be notarized.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

And you have to be able to cancel it at any time.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Because the seriousness of this contract should require proof that you agreed to it

A little click box is fine for something that doesn’t matter, but for lifetime real time surveillance, that’s important enough that you should have a serious contract with proof that you actually signed it

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like this was something that needed to be stopped decades ago but now it's just not possible to do this. You can't wait until it's this big then start thinking how to change it

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The other option is to look at the possible outcomes and in this case the direction we are on is unacceptable.

Better to start now because it gets costlier by the minute to delay.

That which is unsustainable tends not to be sustained.

[–] Alaknar@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

it is technically needed, the industry needs to have a written contract with the user, which describes in detail which data is shared. It must be a separate contract from anything else, and one each for each industry partner.

That's the Terms and Conditions that nobody reads.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I'm not talking about a "one click for everything". I'm talking about a separate, written contract that can be cancelled at any time, without cause for any other obligation.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

The t&c are not a separate contract, though. Its a "take it or leave it" signing here gets you the car and the agreement to be spied upon.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I read them all now with Chatgpt. Just fed it in and summarize

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 12 points 1 day ago

Hahaha welcome to the eu

[–] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In the owner's manual, it says you consent to data collection by driving the car and if you don't consent, you should return the car to the nearest dealer.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

I'll bet if you tried it the dealer would refuse to take it back.

I'd like to be a fly on the wall in that court case.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Fuck them and the horse they rode on. Stuff like that needs to be made illegal.