this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
754 points (95.4% liked)

Comic Strips

21198 readers
3623 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 2 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

The statistics clearly show that poorer people have more children than richer people, so does having material comfort cause despair or are many people confused about their own motivations?

[–] coyootje@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago

I think that people with access to higher education who also have constant access to world news is bound to lead to people not wanting to put their kids through it. If you compare that to someone who barely has access to the internet and whose main focus is trying to feed their family and it's a whole different situation. Humans need meaning in their lives and in western societies this has been waning for a while now.

[–] dp@thebrainbin.org 12 points 22 hours ago

I’d say both are involved, but of the two, far more the latter than the former.

My observation is that generally speaking, poor countries tend to be conservative politically; and where the country is richer than the statistically poorer countries, the conservative group within tend to be poorer per capita.

My guess (and that’s all it really is), is that procreation factors very heavily into the conservative religious ethos, and in that it appears that religion will be heavily rooted in poorer nations/socioeconmic areas, having(or making) (as many) children (as possible) is a god-given mandate.

Doesn’t matter the conditions into which children are born because they will follow the will of god and live in eternal happiness after death. The misery they endure here on earth will be forever forgotten in the joys of their afterlives.

This is, at least, how it seems to me, and is just my opinion.

[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 3 points 18 hours ago

This is not your boomer's "poor".