this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
13 points (81.0% liked)

Atheism

5524 readers
353 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I recently wrote an essay exploring why I believe science and religion are inherently incompatible at a fundamental level. This isn’t just about creationism vs. evolution. It’s about truth-seeking, evidence, and dogma.

As a LaVeyan Satanist, I approach this from a position that prioritizes rationality, indulgence, and self-honesty over faith and obedience. The essay challenges the popular narrative that the two can peacefully coexist without contradiction.

I’d love to hear opposing views or additions, whether you agree, disagree, or want to expand on it.

Here’s the full essay on Substack (no paywall):
https://open.substack.com/pub/oscarazrael/p/why-science-and-religion-cant-coexist?r=6v3r0a

I'm ooking forward to the discussion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DravenAzrael@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Appreciate you taking the time to reply, but let’s not mistake disagreement for a lack of clarity. The essay doesn’t claim “all religion is evil” or reduce billions of people to caricatures. What it does argue explicitly is that science and religion function on opposing epistemologies: one demands evidence, the other demands belief. That’s not an attack, it’s a structural incompatibility.

You’re right that religion isn’t a monolith. But I’m not writing a comparative religion thesis. I’m addressing the general function of religious belief across dominant systems. Whether it’s monotheism or mysticism, once faith is used as a justification for truth claims, we’ve exited the realm of science.

And yes, some religions pursued knowledge. But pursuing knowledge without the tools to verify it isn’t science, it's glorified guessing. Druidry may have honored the stars, but they weren’t testing hypotheses or refining models through falsification. That’s the difference.

As for examples like the Crusades and Inquisition being “passé”, history doesn’t get less relevant just because it’s inconvenient. That said, I’ll gladly expand the catalog. Religious opposition to stem cell research, the HIV crisis in Africa fueled by anti-condom dogma, modern-day witch hunts in Nigeria and India... need I go on?

Bottom line: if belief is held above reason, then any religion, monotheistic or otherwise, can be dangerous. That’s not a sweeping condemnation. It's a warning label.