this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2026
214 points (92.1% liked)

politics

27143 readers
3008 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] daannii@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

I read his whole transcript. I want to firstly be 100 clear.

  1. I believe he was hurt as a child.

  2. I believe he witnessed at least 1 murder of a girl. (This story was semi consistent).

  3. Despite my following opinions on his report, I want to clarify again, that even with errors in his story, this does not invalidate the primary crimes against him.

Now on to my other thoughts.

There are a lot of inconsistencies in his report. Now he admits that details are foggy. He was a child after all and he also says he's not 100% on what happened in what order.

He sounds like he has mental health problems like PTSD and possibly some psychosis.

Psychosis is specifically defined as a break with reality.

The reason I would say he is exhibiting some psychotic symptoms is because of some of the things about conspiracy theories that he says. (I elaborate on these below).

When we discuss his memories from childhood it's important to remember that it's incredibly easy to have false or distorted memories of childhood events. It's the norm rather than the exception.

Again this does not invalidate his claims of being trafficked. And I believe him.

However I think he is mixed up about some things and has mixed in fiction to some of his accounts.

The interviewer starts off asking if he ever met Trump and he said no. Said he heard his name but never met him.

By the end he recounts an experience with trump and says he never knew his name. Just his face. And recognized him from tv.

He also claims that the handlers (a term used for spy agent conspiracy theories) uses mk ultra brain washing to make him violent. By using images of sex and violence paired with sounds. Another time he says his eyes were forced open with some device like from the clockwork orange. (Mkultra conditioning a sleeper agent is fiction. It's not real. It doesn't work.)

I think all of these parts and the parts about trump being involved are not true stories but mostly false memories. A combination cocktail with real experiences, movie lore, TV shows, and maybe bad dreams.

He says he believes they were trying to create multiple personalities for him and said he did have these.

Again. Not uncommon in kids to remember things they heard as their own biographical memory.

Side story. A friend once told me he had this memory of when he was a kid, and as an adult he was watching some 90s movie with someone and realized his memory was actually what happened to the kid in the movie. He said this really bothered him because it always felt real but then he started questioning how much of his autobiographical memories were even his own life (Common with childhood memory but not adult, I can explain why if you are interested).

Anywho.

People get really upset when you talk about false memory (like you are calling them a liar) but there is extensive research on this topic and I'm familiar with that research.

False memory is not fabrication. It's believed to be true. It feels true. Often emotions and even "I remember what I was thinking" are present in these memories. Sometimes they feel more vivid than real memories. I could go into why that is if you are interested.

There was another incident involving someone drinking a kid's blood.

False memories have a long history of being associated with sexual assault and satanism.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanic_panic

Also, I will say though that it's possible the people trafficking him around intentionally created these elaborate satanic scenes so that if he reported them, he would be dismissed as inventing a crazy story.

Lastly I want to say that even if it comes out that most of his story was not possible to be true, or that he has a very serious mental health diagnosis, that this does not mean none of it was true.

This is another tactic that abusers use. If the adult victim is mentally unwell, then anything they say is dismissed, Because at least some of it was proven to not be real.

It's a way for predators to blame the victim even more.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_memory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childhood_amnesia

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

False memories have a long history of being associated with sexual assault and satanism.

That's from that lady in the 80s who worked with "recovered memories", asked a bunch of hypnotized children a bunch of leading questions and basically placed the memories in the kids' heads, right? All having to do with satanic ritual abuse.

I'm curious why this typically happens in childhood and not to adults tho.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Yeah there was a few psychologists responsible for causing kids to think they were in a cult. Dr Elizabeth Loftus was the researcher who has spent her career investigating false memory and how it's created and strengthened. She also does work with eye witnesses. How witnesses can be led to form false memory of perpetrator or even what happened.

It's honestly kind of upsetting to many people when they learn how easily memory can be manipulated and how unreliable our own memory is.

We like to think we "know" what we saw. And we would know if a memory wasn't real. But we often do not.

[–] adhd_traco@piefed.social 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

FWIW

I stopped reading the first time after this sentence. Which is a shame, because what you write otherwise seems well-balanced and reasonable for what you're focusing on.

He also claims that the handlers (a term used for spy agent conspiracy theories)

Sorry, this statement seems meaningless, or even misinfo, because the term is used in credible reports.

For illegals, in-person meetings with their KGB handlers were rare, and usually took place in third countries...

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2025/apr/10/deep-cover-kgb-spy-recruited-son-peter-herrmann-illegals

According to court documents, Angwang told his handler he wanted to get promoted within the police force so that he could bring “glory to China”.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/21/new-york-police-officer-china-tibetan-immigrants-spying-charges