this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
463 points (80.3% liked)

Comic Strips

21164 readers
2563 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (9 children)

And let's not talk about contraceptive pills for men, that have been heavily fought against because one of the listed side effects are impotency.

Instead, let's push hormones on a sex that relies on them heavily to function properly, and hope that nothing will break.

[–] the_strange@feddit.org 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

As always, to get approval for a drug, the potential side effects have to outweigh the benefits of the drug. From a purely logical and medical standpoint, there is no medical drawback for a man when the hormonal contraceptive fails and neither is there a medical benefit. If there are serious side effects, they have to outweigh the medical benefit and drawbacks, of which there are none, so that's pretty hard.

For women on the other hand, medically speaking pregnancy is a huge condition, sometimes dangerous, so there is a benefit and drawback if it doesn't work and the drugs are approved despite having side effects.

[–] mirshafie@europe.pub 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think that if a company was serious about bringing a male contraceptive to market, the medical benefits of preventing unwanted pregnancies would be taken into account by the EMA/FDA, even if the user of the drug isn't the primary beneficiary.

The problem is that despite lots of research no viable drug has been found yet.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 days ago

I think you flipped what you meant to say

load more comments (6 replies)