this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
20 points (71.7% liked)
Bathtub Thoughts
154 readers
1 users here now
This community is inspired by this post on !showerthoughts@lemmy.world:
We really need a community where you can just post about anything that you’re really passionate about, which you’re currently researching/thinking about, sothat others can learn something about it as well and maybe discuss about it.
This showerthoughts community is a bit like it because you can just post whatever comes to your mind, but i’d like it to be more in-depth and with higher quality. Something like showerthoughts, but bathtubthoughts, i.e. when you’re soaking in a hot bathtub and thinking about stuff for 20 minutes or sth, and then post that. You know what i mean?
Related communities:
founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
20
Vienna would need about 150 km² of solar panels to produce enough electricity
(discuss.tchncs.de)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments


Uhm 30MWh? That can't be right...
In the past 5 years on average my home has used around 3.5MWh per year. We live here with two persons so that would be around 1.75MWh per person per year. Now let's say we are very efficient and say the average person would need about 2.5MWh per year, that's still one order of magnitude off from your number.
I can't believe the average person in Vienna uses that much energy, especially not those living in apartment buildings.
Edit:
Ah they include everything in that graph, so the entire energy requirements of the nation divided by the population. So this includes agriculture, industry, transportation (including gas for personal vehicles) etc.
This is a pretty unfair comparison, as the people in the city would only need to generate the power for living there. Industry can have its own power sources. And in my experience many farmers have huge solar installations on top of their huge ass barns. They produce so much energy they often have their own energy infra building next to their property.
So if you include all of the energy for stuff that isn't living, you should also include all of the surface area for stuff that isn't living. In other words, way more than just the city itself.
And getting 100% of that energy from solar probably isn't the best idea, it should be a mix of sources to make sure power is always available.
Yeah my reasoning was that big industrial (manufacturing, not agriculture) centers are often close to cities so the energy is consumed close to the city :) So it counts as "city consumption" to me.