this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
59 points (91.5% liked)

Health - Resources and discussion for everything health-related

3819 readers
176 users here now

Health: physical and mental, individual and public.

Discussions, issues, resources, news, everything.

See the pinned post for a long list of other communities dedicated to health or specific diagnoses. The list is continuously updated.

Nothing here shall be taken as medical or any other kind of professional advice.

Commercial advertising is considered spam and not allowed. If you're not sure, contact mods to ask beforehand.

Linked videos without original description context by OP to initiate healthy, constructive discussions will be removed.

Regular rules of lemmy.world apply. Be civil.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rwdf@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (4 children)

It's almost as if there are no shortcuts, but a lasting diet and lifestyle change works.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The shortcut is a change of lifestyle by getting regular Ozempic injections and not stopping.

[–] troed@fedia.io 28 points 3 days ago

The people needing these medications have different signaling issues meaning "just keeping to the diet" isn't that easy because their bodies fight actively against it.

As a migraine basketcase I see no issues with having to take medications for the rest of someone's life. Ok then.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I mean... the drug simply makes you eat less. The moment you stop taking it and begin eating more, of course you are gaining that weight again. Seems people have a hard time understanding that the weight gain comes from what you ingest. You can't generate fat out of air or doing the photosynthesis.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why is this comment so controversial? Banding and stomach stapling work the same way - by limiting input. There is a saying in the sports community "you can't outrun your fork".

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Because we know. Knowing is not the hard part, the hard part is the keeping up with the diet.

"It seems like people don't know" nah, that's wrong. People do know, they are bombarded with information.

[–] edible_funk@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I'm my experience a surprising number of people believe their metabolism and amount they exercise are all to do with their weight gain and not CICO. Unless you're a bodybuilder you're gonna burn around 2000 kcal a day pretty much regardless of your regular activity level. Eat more than that and you gain weight, eat less and you lose it. It's literally the only way.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Being bombarded with information does not make one knowledgeable, especially when that information is often arcane and contradictory.

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Sure, but people aren't having a hard time understanding that what you eat is what affects your weight. People are having a hard time containing their own appetite telling them to eat what they know will make them fat.

That's why the comment above is being challenged, it's wrong and makes it sound like fat people are stupid.

[–] DrBob@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

I think Velociraptor is saying the study is stupid, not people.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Thats fine, but just saying "people are being bombarded with information" does not mean they know. That's what I'm challenging.

An implication of what I said is also, just because you understand it doesn't mean everyone else does, or even in the same way. A lot of the time when people come in with a "well d'uh" argument to seemingly common sense studies, it's because they believe they understand it and assume everyone else believes the same about themselves. Which is rarely the case.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We needed a study to establish that after stopping the intake of a drug that makes you eat less (and starting to eat more because of stopping), you regain the lost weight. I know people understand a concept as obvious as this, but apparently, if we needed such a study, it wasn't that clear to some.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's a willpower issue, not an information issue.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then you don't need a study that tells you that not taking the drug makes you gain weight again. Yet here's a study saying so.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

People just do studies, okay? We have a lot of PhDs kicking about, if we don't keep them busy they'll become unruly.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

the drug simply makes you eat less. The moment you stop taking it and begin eating more

and yet Oxford needed a study funded to establish that.

I mean, yes? To establish that appetite reduction is a standard "side" effect of the drug, definitely.

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 4 points 3 days ago

The drug is a great aid for making those changes. Indeed just use it and you'll magically be thinner doesn't last.