this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
712 points (98.8% liked)

politics

28853 readers
1760 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7101334@lemmy.world -4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

The choice was: Harris, Trump, or no vote.

Rephrased: the choice was endorsing genocide, endorsing genocide, or not endorsing genocide.

I'm happy with the choice I made, and disgusted that you're willing to sign your name off to endorse piles of dead children to protect your own privilege and comfort.

If supporting a holocaust is the price of protecting America, then the price is too high and we should refuse to pay it regardless of what comes next.

Not to mention that the Harris campaign's internal polling revealed they never had her polling higher than Trump. They knew she had no chance of winning, and pressed on with her word-salad anyway. The Democrats could've run someone like Bernie (who is also a lame liberal Zionist) and won easily, even at his age. But they can't do that, because their primary function in the empire is to kill emergent left-wing revolutionary movements.

You're defending the enemy and the system which produced these consequences you're ostensibly so appalled by.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Of course you’re happy with your choice. Most people who lack responsibility are.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ad hominem with no actual counterpoints

This is why we call you people Blue MAGA

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The counterpoints are you used the Palestinian tragedy as an excuse for your laziness and lack of responsibility.

That you and others not voting elected Trump and made things worse for the people whose back you rode on with your shitty opinion and lack of national duty. They’re an excuse you use to cover your spinelessness and laziness.

You voted to worsen that genocide, not help it. You’re the reason it occurred, you were played and the Palestinians paid with their life to play grubs like you.

Hang your head in shame, both for using Palestinians as your excuse and for letting your countrymen down.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

That's actually just more ad hominem, not a meaningful counterpoint. Want to try again?

And I have absolutely zero "national duty" to a nation predicated on genocide, white supremacy, and environmental degradation. I do have a duty to humanity - a label which, contrary to common liberal ethos, applies no less to Palestinians than it does to Americans.

You’re the reason it occurred, you were played and the Palestinians paid with their life to play grubs like you.

This is the only slightly-true thing you said because, yes, I am partially responsible in that I was fooled into for voting for Biden in 2020. The genocide began with the founding of the illegitimate Zionazi state, but it certainly increased in intensity under Biden. Don't worry, it's not a mistake I'll ever make again.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thats more ad hominem

Coming from someone who rides on the backs of others deaths, say what you like, honestly.

zero national duty

Yeah we know.

predicated on genocide

Well, you put them there. It’s on you. Well done.

this is partially true

No, it’s fully true. Learning that you actually did something right last election makes it worse. Unless you’re lying.

the genocide began..

More riding on the backs of dead people to cover your shitty act and make you look good.

don’t worry…

I won’t. You’re not hurting me, only yourself and, given you’re not a Russian plant which could be just as possible, your countrymen.

Certainly, the Russians and Netanyahu find you a useful idiot at best.

Now go crawl back under your rock, I’m watching football.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago
[–] iglou@programming.dev 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There was going to be a supporter of genocide in the office in any case. You had the choice between a supporter of genocide, and a supporter of genocide with a fascist program. You chose the high road and got the worst outcome.

Your issue was pride.

Thank you for perfectly illustrating my point.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you call refusing to sign my name to endorse genocide "pride", then absolutely I am prideful as all fuck and will wear that badge proudly.

Your issue was cowardice. Maintaining your own comfort is more important than making even the most pithy stand.

[–] iglou@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Oh yes, by not voting you sacrificed so much of your comfort. You made such a worthy stand.

You have achieved nothing else than enabling Trump. And you don't even realise it.

The Trump campaign counted on people like you to win. You served them well.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Don't bother with them. The useful idiot lacks any capacity for logical reasoning.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's okay, I guess. I don't care who won because they're the same. That's the point.

If I voted for Shitler by not voting for Holocaust Harris, did I also vote for Holocaust Harris by not voting for Shitler? Infinite vote glitch unlocked!

[–] iglou@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

They're not even remotely the same.

If I voted for Shitler by not voting for Holocaust Harris, did I also vote for Holocaust Harris by not voting for Shitler? Infinite vote glitch unlocked!

It is concerning that you do not understand that not voting enabled Trump. You're a lost cause.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Here we go. Funny how the Gaza news cycle dropped the past year. It's almost like it's a non issue now that the election cycle is over.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

Hasn't dropped for me. Don't care what the corporate media is doing or saying. Why would I?