this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
25 points (100.0% liked)

3DPrinting

20885 readers
55 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe/ may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tried printing the frog from this set at 75% scale, and it came out like this. The original 3mf for this one doesn't include supports. What should I adjust on my printer to get better overhangs without supports?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Without supports? Why cripple yourself by denying the easiest most simple and direct solution?

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 9 points 6 days ago

This is more to tweak/tune the printer to print better. I have an ender3v3, and I know it can print it without supports fine, so trying to figure out why this one can't

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

I've never seen support material visually improve overhangs apart from the specialized support filament that doesn't bond with the print material. Traditional support always leaves a gap between the support material and the print material, otherwise they'd fuse together and become one with the print, meaning even with support, the print material sags anyway.

OP would probably be better served with adaptive layers and using a much finer layer height in the overhang region.