this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2026
712 points (98.8% liked)

politics

28853 readers
1760 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The problem wasn't Harris. Was the repeated cycle of "vote for us or they will come". It was the same with Biden and Hillary. Had the Dems go with a valid candidate and not a finger appointed glass of temperate water that only was more of the same shit, Trump wouldn't have stand a chance.

Every time the "vote for us or else" threat is used it loses strength, because the "vote for us" part is only "we keep the things just as they are now". And the way to stop Trump and people like Trump is changing things so massively that they can't retaliate with some bullshit message. Because every time someone like Trump or a little less deranged takes power steers the politic table to the right as much as possible. And the solution can't be "let's not move the table". MOVE THE FUCKING TABLE TO THE LEFT! The right and far right is gonna insult you for being in power, no matter what you do. So go full throttle and do things for the people and go as far as you can.

[–] iglou@programming.dev 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I agree with the sentiment and the source of this cycle of fascism, but the solution was not to let it happen.

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

"I agree that liberals paved way to the rise of fascism, but the solution was to vote for them anyway. Then I could've expressed half-hearted dismay at all the dead brown children on my feed, but maintained comfort in knowing that it ultimately would not effect me."

You reap what you sow. Welcome to brunch.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nice. Deleted account? Day old one? Or both?

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

...Neither? Browsing is hard, I know.

[–] iglou@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago

I didn't say the solution was in the vote.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social -3 points 2 months ago

Let's say Harris had won. Who'll be next? An even softer Democrat? Against Trump or JD Vance or Miller or ...? It's either change things or let the fascist change them.