this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
1466 points (99.4% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

2587 readers
365 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

They can charge as much as they want for the stupid bottled water, but safe drinking water should come out of the taps and be free for everyone. That’s not the case in too much of the world, no thanks to megacorps.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Tap water isn't free, but yes it should be safe water.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The per unit cost of a cup of tap water approaches zero. In my area, it’s about €0.0005. This includes all the costs of extraction, purification, and distribution.

Yes, there is a water connection fee and usage rate but drinking should be offered gratis. Bring your own beaker.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

why do people keep feeling the need to make this stupid distinction? we understand that things paid for by taxes aren't without cost

[–] Lupie@sopuli.xyz 7 points 5 days ago

Probably because in the US tap water isn't free. If you don't pay your water bill they cut your service with a digital valve in your yard.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'm guessing you're not American but we actually pay a water bill

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 3 points 5 days ago

Also in Canada, though it's rather cheap and if you're renting it's something usually covered by your landlord (ofc the average cost is definitely just added into the rent price)

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

okay, you're technically right, I do pay for water consumption since I am on a municipal supply

but, like, it's so cheap to the consumer that it's basically free, particular as it relates to drinking water consumption

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

It's not even just taxes. Every place I've ever lived in has to pay a water bill.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Places selling bottled water aren't really selling water, they're selling convenience. As long as water is available in a less convenient way (say tap water or even a clean stream), I don't see the problem with selling a bottled version for people who want water they can carry with them on a bike ride or something.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I agree, to an extent, but the bottles are a serious environmental concern.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Plastic ones sure. Glass ones are pretty easy to recycle, AFAIK.