this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
-23 points (18.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

36552 readers
1338 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I mean can't we just enslave them if they think working a lot without asking much in return is ethical? If they think that the poor deserves to be poor and they will go to hell anyways so if we keep them poor and enslave them and tell them that they deserve it and should be working for us and simply accuse them of being sinful if they do not comply? If they want to be crushed under capitalism so much then why not just give them what they want and we can live comfortable and enjoyable lives while they are working for us.

Edit: Calvin says “It is enough to be successful at your job in for the lord to love you” and “The only job of business owners and traders should be increasing their wealth because even the god gave the duty of ruling over others to them”. Zubritski, Kerov, Mitropelski, The Primitive Community, the Slave Society, the Feudal Society, p.257 I read the book in a different laguage so made the translation by myself but of course you can find it in english too. So dear friend, it is perfectly ethical for calvinists to work their asses off without asking for much in return since business owners have to be as greedy as possible meaning that they should give as little as possible to their workers and in return, the only thing god wants from workers is to be good at their job and it is enough. Furthermore, Calvinists also believe that god chose an elected few and gave them the wealth and they will also go to heaven while all others will go to hell no matter what and thats why they are poor. By that logic, it is perfectly ethical for protestants if we ensave them and make them work for us for almost nothing in return and abuse them as much as we want too. We can eat an entire table of food while watching them suffer and beg us to give them some food even a single piece of bread and not even give that one since they also respect property rights at its fullest and they will still find this ethical. I hope this explains.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Libb@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That is why the ' Enlightenment' ideas should not have been thrown out the window.

I would suggest you read people like Jean-Jacques Rousseau or Etienne de La Boétie, maybe even Voltaire. Those were all French (or French speaking) but they all have been translated into English for a good reason: it's worth reading them even if you are not lucky enough to read French.

They, as well as many other thinkers btw, they have reflected on what it meant to be free while they were living in a not free society. And considered what it could mean to be free and to live with other free people.

Way too grossly summarized: it means to respect the other, to have empathy for the other, to know the only true ground to building a society and working together while remaining free is not through a religion or the 'family' (family being an ad hoc association between people, dixit Rousseau) but it is in the the realization we can do a lot more work by freely/willingly working together than working alone. And then it follows that no matter how absolutely free we may decide we are we should be fine with putting limits to our own freedom as a way to make sure other people will also put limits to their (and not threatens ours), making sure we don't end up considering all other persons as mere... resources that re waiting for us to exploit them.

That's why it's important, as free persons, to recognize certain limits to our individual freedom (and power) including agreeing a common set of values, moral and educative, that we all agree to follow and to enforce them upon all of us equally (oneself included). Like... to not enslave your neighbor (no matter the color of their skin, faith, or whatever else).