this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
3 points (52.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

36552 readers
1115 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What's your take? I'm not sure if I know of an historic case of it like IDK maybe 200 or 150 years ago but nowadays I have several cases near of autistic people, so what do you think is old or new?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 28 points 6 days ago (2 children)

My only correction would be that autism isn't a mental illness. It's a difference in brain structure - synaptic density seems to play a significant role (https://medicine.yale.edu/news-article/a-key-brain-difference-linked-to-autism-is-found-for-the-first-time-in-living-people/).

"Eccentric" would indeed have been the word, even as late as the 80s. And that's just men; women often present symptoms differently, or different symptoms entirely and even today ASD can go unnoticed for much longer in young women.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world -3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The definition and classification of mental disorders are key issues for researchers as well as service providers and those who may be diagnosed. For a mental state to be classified as a disorder, it generally needs to cause dysfunction.[15] Most international clinical documents use the term mental "disorder", while "illness" is also common. It has been noted that using the term "mental" (i.e., of the mind) is not necessarily meant to imply separateness from the brain or body.

According to the fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV), published in 1994, a mental disorder is a psychological syndrome or pattern that is associated with distress (e.g., via a painful symptom), disability (impairment in one or more important areas of functioning), increased risk of death, or causes a significant loss of autonomy.

In 2013, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) redefined mental disorders in the DSM-5 as "a syndrome characterized by clinically significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotion regulation, or behavior that reflects a dysfunction in the psychological, biological, or developmental processes underlying mental functioning."

I dunno, sounds to me like autism fits fine with "mental illness", possibly depending on the severity/placement on the spectrum. Note that mental illness isn't something easily defined. I just pulled the quotes above from Wikipedia.

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/autism-spectrum-disorders-asd

Autism isn't a "mental state", it is structural differences in the brain. Being included in the DSM doesn't automatically classify something as a mental illness, the DSM is published by a single body, the APA. Other professional individuals and organisations have opinions on that: https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/the-concept-of-mental-illness-and-why-the-dsm-approach-is-wrong

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Being included in the DSM doesn't automatically classify something as a mental illness

No, but those descriptions of a mental illness I thought fit autism fairly well. 🤷‍♂️ That's what I meant.

[–] kewjo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

would you consider left-handedness a disability? just because someone struggles with things that suit the majority doesn't mean it's an illness

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

Left-handedness doesn't need to be a struggle, does it? We don't force kids to write with their right hand anymore since many decades.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

autism isn't a mental illness. It's a difference in brain structure

Define mental illness?

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Probably any neurodivergence that results in causing harm to self or others, and inability to conform with societal norms.

I pulled that out of me arse but it sounds logical enough.

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This seems incredibly disingenuous when you can just go search the internet for the definition, and why autism isn't a classified as mental illness, but sure, I'll humour you.

"Autism" is a spectrum of developmental disorders that stem from those brain structure differences I mentioned. An illness is when something is wrong. Not just different, wrong. There's nothing "wrong" in an autistic person; autism is not a disease or sickness caused by some outside force like a virus or bacteria or drug; it's not transmissible, and it cannot be developed post hoc (meaning you can't acquire autism, you're born with it). There's no innate reduction in function. It can't be treated or cured; the symptoms of the mental illnesses caused by dealing with neurotypicals can, but again those aren't something we're born with; those are acquired.

At the root of it, we just process information differently than a neurotypical person due to our brains growing differently. It's like saying ARM is "silicon illness" because it's not x86_64.

https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/news/publications/health-matters/what-is-autism

[–] victorz@lemmy.world -3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

This seems incredibly disingenuous when you can just go search the internet for the definition

The F? That's what I did, and posted in the other comment. :⁠-⁠P

I think there's a definition of "wrong" here as well. That's a very subjective definition. My god son has autism, and he has problems in school, and it makes life difficult for his parents and siblings. That's not "wrong"? It creates harm in some definition.

I dunno, I'm not trying to blame autistic people or make them seem bad or worth less or something, I'm just saying that it sure feels like an illness sometimes. I also suspect I have some ultra mild placement on the spectrum, and it can be challenging in certain situations.

[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I was responding when you posted that, so I didn't see it, and you didn't respond to me, so if you hadn't said that I might not have seen it at all. And you didn't bother to look before responding to me because...?

Moreover, I did you a favour by responding with relevant information instead of just telling you to educate yourself, and you want to act like I'm an asshole for pointing out why your question seemed disingenuous? Cool, cheers.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world -2 points 6 days ago

and you didn't respond to me, so if you hadn't said that I might not have seen it at all.

But I did respond to you. The comment with the definitions from Wikipedia is a response to your comment.

And you didn't bother to look before responding to me because...?

Didn't bother, or didn't have time at the moment. 🤷‍♂️ Sometimes life happens. When I had time, I bothered, as you saw. 👍

you want to act like I'm an asshole

What? No, I don't. Why would I? 🤨