this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
626 points (98.0% liked)
Technology
78482 readers
2744 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Microsoft deserves all the crap they've ordered, but skipping 9 on versioning was pretty smart move on their part. There's still a ton of older software which just checks if windows version matches 'windows 9' to include both 95 and 98 (and all their variants). If 8.1 was released as 9 it would've broken a lot of compatibility which at least then was a big deal for Windows. And it still is, but now it seems that they'll happily break everything from their most known product.
Not even the issues with software just checking for ‘windows 9’. But, people are…umm…not smart. And there would a whole bunch of people thinking windows 95 or 98 was the same thing as windows 9. Windows 8.1 was 9. MS just didn’t call it 9 to avoid pebkac issues. With that said, fuck MS.