this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
647 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

78435 readers
3540 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 287 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

Tired of those annoying cookie banners? They’re not just frustrating—they're a lazy response to GDPR.

They’re not lazy, they’re maliciously compliant. The sites know how to comply with GDPR, but wanted to throw a fit instead. So they came up with the annoying cookie banners, to make users hate GDPR instead of hating the sites that were stealing and selling all of their data. And the worst part is that it worked. Many people wholly equate GDPR with the cookie banners, instead of the massive leap in privacy rights that it represented when it was passed.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 132 points 6 days ago

They’re not lazy, they’re maliciously compliant.

Often times they're not even compliant.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 47 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

It's a lot easier to dislike GDPR when you don't live in a country that benefits from it, but it still annoys you.

[–] AstaKask@lemmy.cafe 38 points 5 days ago

GDPR doesn't annoy anyone. The incompetent developers who made the banners do. There is absolutely no need for them.

[–] Dalvoron@lemmy.zip 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Excellent points, but the cookie banners were a response to the ePrivacy Directive, not GDPR. In fact the banners predate GDPR by about a decade! I know this because I decided to make my own banner that was slightly less annoying about five years before GDPR was a thing.

Funnily enough most of your points are still correct precisely because, as you say, "most people wholly equate GDPR with the cookie banners".

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

I don't remember seeing any banners before GDPR?

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

This is not correct. Since gdpr isn't required in most of the world, they don't want to comply. It's not about making users hate them. It's about collecting data, and simply complying with gdpr where they have to, and only where they have to.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

It's not about making users hate them. It's about collecting data,

Making users hate GDPR and revolting against it is a means to that end though, of collecting data.