this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
129 points (95.7% liked)

Steam Hardware

20208 readers
216 users here now

A place to discuss and support all Steam Hardware, including Steam Deck, Steam Machine, Steam Frame, and SteamOS in general.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Deck] - Steam Deck related.
[Machine] - Steam Machine related.
[Frame] - Steam Frame related.
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

If your post is only relevant to one hardware device (Deck/Machine/Frame/etc) please specify which one as part of the title or by using a device flair.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

i was gonna get a quest 3 for christmas but then the steam frame got announced and i was like HELL NAH and thew my quest 3 ideas out of the window. if everything falls into place il have my steam frame just intime for my birthday :D

gone will the days where i will be kicked from vrc lobbies for being a "Questie". gone will be the days of my game crashing mid snuggle session, gone the days of having a lowkey mid game selection (apart from like metro awakening as if i was gonna get the quest 3 i would have 100% gotten that game)

cant wait to get ittttt (also i cant wait to play half life alyx on it)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] helimopp@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

i feel like steam is gonna sell them at a good price even if they are gonna make a loss on them, because gaben is tuff like that

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 35 minutes ago

I'm fully expecting this to be triple the price of the Quest 3S.

[–] erusuoyera@sh.itjust.works 12 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

They are definitely not selling the Gabe cube at a loss. The steam deck could be sold at a loss, because people will buy steam games for it, but the steam machine is a PC, and there would be nothing stopping, for example, corporations buying thousands as cheap workstations that will never see a single steam purchase.

[–] helimopp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

good point. could they be selling the steam frame at a loss since its more game oriented?

[–] potustheplant@feddit.nl 6 points 6 hours ago

The post (and replies) are about the VR headset (steam frame), not the gabecube.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Most corporations just buy laptops and then the world's cheapest docking stations. So would have to be cheaper than a mid-tier laptop and I can't see that being likely.

[–] Lfrith@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

Yep and once warranty is finished they sell off the hardware allowing me to pick up solid used Thinkpads to run Linux on. Warranty service is too important to corporations.

[–] cloudwolf@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Unless the price is ridiculously low, corporations are not buying thousands of anything without a support contract. Next day repairs/exchanges and priority support are a must when dealing with hardware at scale, and Valve is not going to offer that.

Dell/Lenovo/HP are already more expensive than consumer-grade hardware from Best Buy unless you are a very large customer. Companies pay for reliability, warranty and support.

[–] DanWolfstone@leminal.space 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Not to point this at you but I am getting a bit tired of hearing people parrot the point that If they're low cost then corps will buy them in droves.

Most companies will set up a deal with other companies to buy bulk at low prices, I highly doubt valve will offer that considering the restrictions they put on buying the steam deck to avoid scalpers.

I'd like to hope the Gabe cube be priced at a reasonable consumer viable price (+ ram tax) with the same 1 per account restriction that they had on the deck

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 5 hours ago

Blame LTT for that. They're the ones that put out the initial idea that corporations might buy them thus valve cannot sell them at a loss.

When I first heard them say that I initially thought "yeah that makes sense". But after a while of thinking about it, no it doesn't make any sense at all, I have no idea why he said that.