People Twitter

8923 readers

1070 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

820

This seems specifically designed to break mail-in voting (USPS postmark rule change) (lemmy.zip)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by BoycottTwitter@lemmy.zip to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

116 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archive links: https://web.archive.org/web/20251229233408/https://bsky.app/profile/goldengateblond.bsky.social/post/3mb5t23bf3k23 or https://archive.is/uvuWB

If you want to vote by mail please do so as soon as you can and consider dropping it off at the counter where they will postmark it right away.

Also if you live in a state where you're allowed to photograph your ballot consider doing so to have proof you voted a certain way.

Note that as a counterpoint the federal register website claims they are just clarifying language to improve public understanding: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/08/12/2025-15266/postmarks-and-postal-possession

I didn't check that document very closely yet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Please don't imagined this couldn't happen. Germany is not without active political threats. When a system can be abused it's only a meter of time before it is.

The difference is that in a system where the standard is set to postmarked upon arrival it requires an active deviation from protocol that is more discoverable and potentially an illegal offense. It's not bullet proof, but more difficult to manipulate intentionally or unintentionally on a large scale.

[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Intentionally delaying a mailing is already a crime in itself. And if you already have the power to shut down a mailing hub for a day or two without abyone noticing, I don't see how it would be more difficult to change the date in the stamping machine.

I have no doubt that, when the Nazis come to power here as well, they will use all measures to suppress free voting. We of all people know how that works. But in that case, using the stamping date for mail-in voting won't stop them anyway, as that's a simple law, that can simply be changed by the people in power. Case in point: This very article about changing the postmark application rules. It seems, they didn't even have to change a law for that, just some USPS internal guidelines.