this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2025
140 points (78.9% liked)

Unpopular Opinion

8329 readers
455 users here now

Welcome to the Unpopular Opinion community!


How voting works:

Vote the opposite of the norm.


If you agree that the opinion is unpopular give it an arrow up. If it's something that's widely accepted, give it an arrow down.



Guidelines:

Tag your post, if possible (not required)


  • If your post is a "General" unpopular opinion, start the subject with [GENERAL].
  • If it is a Lemmy-specific unpopular opinion, start it with [LEMMY].


Rules:

1. NO POLITICS


Politics is everywhere. Let's make this about [general] and [lemmy] - specific topics, and keep politics out of it.


2. Be civil.


Disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally attack others. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Please also refrain from gatekeeping others' opinions.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Shitposts and memes are allowed but...


Only until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.


5. No trolling.


This shouldn't need an explanation. If your post or comment is made just to get a rise with no real value, it will be removed. You do this too often, you will get a vacation to touch grass, away from this community for 1 or more days. Repeat offenses will result in a perma-ban.


6. Defend your opinion


This is a bit of a mix of rules 4 and 5 to help foster higher quality posts. You are expected to defend your unpopular opinion in the post body. We don't expect a whole manifesto (please, no manifestos), but you should at least provide some details as to why you hold the position you do.



Instance-wide rules always apply. https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't know if she was a troll or a narcissist or whatever everyone else claims. But she did seem to be a little nuts, or at least tone deaf. You can see in that performance with John and Chuck Berry where she just starts sort of screeching in the background on mic for no reason she was at least a little unhinged.

You can call it avant garde, you can say she was annoying, etc. Etc. but she did seem to just shove herself into Johns limelight a lot. There are plenty of other spouses that are just happy to be with their partner, and go with them, but she clearly was intent on shoving herself into the spotlight with him, through whatever means she felt was accessible.

[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Exactly, she got Lennon to record ‘Walking on Thin Ice’ with her, and that's obvious absolute garbage. Worst of all, it was the final song he recorded on the night he's been shot, he died with the cassette of this ugly trash in his hand.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

but she clearly was intent on shoving herself into the spotlight with him, through whatever means she felt was accessible

Well, I mean yeah, she cowrote and performed with him frequently, they were musical partners as well.

If you think the one Chuck Berry video that's been memed to death is the extent of her creative contributions, you're simply ignorant.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

she ruined a great time for John & Chuck. They were both clearly into each other's music, both Chuck and John's just dripping with enthusiasm and excitement, and then she's gotta start fucking keening like a banshee on meth.

it may not be the extent of her creativity but it's a sure sign of someone who's out there to ruin it for other people.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

it’s a sure sign of someone who’s out there to ruin it for other people.

It's not, you're assigning motive based on how it makes you feel. She's made experimental/avant garde music before without trying to "ruin" someone else's fun, so the explanation with the least assumptions is that she simply felt like adding that to the mix.

Why is the narrative with Yoko Ono always that she's trying to "ruin" something?

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Why is the narrative with Yoko Ono always that she’s trying to “ruin” something?

well, it could be because everything she touched got demonstrably worse when she contributed. Huh...?

lemme ask you, as a Yoko Fan: Do you appreciate that performance of Memphis, TN as music, or is it like, watch, she'll have a tantrum and it will make it SO MUCH BETTER?

Artistically you're going to say she added something GOOD to the performance?

Pfft

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

well, it could be because everything she touched got demonstrably worse when she contributed. Huh…?

Not really? Sorry you don't like Lennon's post-Beatles career, but he would take great umbrage to you saying she "ruined" him.

as a Yoko Fan

I'm actually not, just because I'm not a Yoko Hater doesn't mean I like her.

Artistically you’re going to say she added something GOOD to the performance?

Not at all, it's rare for me to enjoy experimental music, I can just compartmentalize Yoko the artist and not try and pathologize her as banshee that seeks to ruin everything she touches because she makes noises I don't like.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

you saying she “ruined” him.

I didn't say that. I said the things she touched got demonstrably worse.

Not at all, it’s rare for me to enjoy experimental music,

whatever chode, you're entitled to your delusions