this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2025
359 points (97.9% liked)

World News

51457 readers
2178 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rebecca Joynes is currently serving a six and a half year prison sentence

A teacher who was convicted for having sex with two boys, becoming pregnant by one, has been banned from the profession.

Maths teacher Rebecca Joynes, 31, was jailed for six and a half years in July last year after being found guilty of six counts of sexual activity with a child, after sleeping with one pupil before falling pregnant by a second while on police bail.

The Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA) convened earlier this month via a virtual hearing, which Joynes did not attend, to consider her professional conduct. A panel recommended she be banned from teaching.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Digit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm glad you want to protect children, and that you're rightly outraged upon perceiving a threat to them, but, there's a lot to unpick there.

you’re justifying the rape of underage men and women by creating a false separation of teens, as if they aren’t children too you sick fuck.

This is a strawman argument, and a rather extreme one, built in part on cherry-picking [(not to mention ad-hominem, red-herring, false equivalence, appeal to emotion, slippery slope fallacy, self contradiction)], and on larger part, non-sequitur, apparently. Wanting to have more nuanced terminology for this is not justifying the rape of anyone. Quite the contrary. Facilitating better communication will help reduce harms.

And speaking of reducing harms, do you have any suggestion for the crux of the dilemma I posed? Given that our current system is increasing the child abuse: How are we to better protect children?

Or maybe you still insist on equivalence under law of a 15 year old having sex, and an under 10...? I'd like to hear your reasoning for that, if you're willing to offer it. You may have a good point I had not thought of... You might be right, and convince me to your way of thinking, ~ though it escapes me how from here, I remain open minded.

Or, if it's just emotional catharsis you need, you could continue to spit unfounded hate at me, misunderstanding and misrepresenting what I say, while the abuse carries on in the background unabated.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago

I'm not going to waste my time debating a fucking creep, you can dress it up however you like sicko, when you're trying to justify raping kids.

17 is a kid. 15 is a kid. stop trying to fucking make excuses for being a creep and seek professional therapy or exile yourself from society.