Astrophotography

3387 readers

14 users here now

Welcome to !astrophotography!

We are Lemmy's dedicated astrophotography community!

If you want to see or post pictures of space taken by amateurs using amateur level equipment, this is the place for you!

If you want to learn more about taking astro photos, check out our wiki or our discord!

Please read the rules before you post! It is your responsibility to be aware of current rules. Failure to be aware of current rules may result in your post being removed without warning at moderator discretion.

Rules

I | Real space images only.

Astrophotography refers to images of astronomical objects or phenomena exclusively.
~~Images that show objects or people below the Kármán Line (100km) will be removed.~~ We won't be enforcing this rule for now, but as the community grows eventually we will split and have a separate space for just landscape astro.
Images must be an accurate representation of a real astronomical object.
See this page for more details

II | Original and Amateur Content Only

Image posts can only be images that you have captured and processed yourself, or discussion about capturing and/or processing your own images.
Images acquired from public sources, professional observatories, or other professional services are not allowed.
If you have done a drastic alteration or reprocessing of a prior submission, you may repost your edit - but only after a minimum of one week has passed.

III | Post Types

Image posts are to link directly to the image, not to landing pages, personal galleries, blogs, or professional sites. Link to these in the comments. (AstroBin and Imgur, are allowed)
Questions are welcome here for the time being.
Links to blogs, articles or external websites should be interesting and promote discussion about amateur astrophotography.

IV | Titles

All image posts should just include include the name of the object being photographed. Extra info such as equipment, it being your first image, or other information should go in a comment along with your acquisition info. Please see this page for more details.

If your post is removed, try reposting with a different title. Don't hesitate to message the mods if you still have questions!

V | Acquisition and Processing Information

All submitted images must include acquisition and processing details as a top-level comment. All posts without this information may be given a warning, and if not updated will be removed.
This includes the telescope, mount, camera, accessories, and any other pieces of equipment you used to capture the image.
You must also include processing details, i.e. the programs you used and a general rundown of the workflow/processes you used within those programs. “Processed in Photoshop” is not enough.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

bigborpa@lemmy.world

lefty7283@lemmy.world

M45 - Pleiades (with a lot of noise) (feddit.org)

submitted 3 days ago by Linsensuppe@feddit.org to c/astrophotography@lemmy.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Equipment used:

Lumix G85
Lumix 100-300 f4-f5.6
SA-GTI

Image:

10 sec, f/6.3, 6400 ISO
1200 Lights
50 Biases, Darks, Flats

Stacked using Siril and edited in GIMP

As you can see, there is a lot of noise, even with heavy editing and noise reduction in siril as well as in GIMP, and I'm out of ideas of what could cause it. I tried different exposures (from 10s to 30s), different ISOs (1600-6400). I tried to manually dither by moving the mount through the App every 30 minutes or so. I also used a lens dew heater at different temperatures ranging from 15°C to -5°C with no difference in noise.

I got a successful result a few months ago with the Orion nebula, the only differences were the exposure of 5 seconds and a Omegon Mount MiniTrack LX3 Essentials mount which couldn't be polar aligned very well. I can't imagine that the difference from 5 to 10 seconds exposure did all the difference.

Can anyone help me?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Try longer exposures, your mount can do 30 sec easily with a 300mm lens, even without guiding.

Also, go through your subs and remove anything that looks out of the ordinary. Better to have 600 good subs than 1200 with bad ones in the mix. Look for clouds and condensation mostly.

This sort of noise increases the closer to the horizon the target gets. Stay above 30 degrees if possible.

Check if your white balance is set to auto, if it is set it to something fixed.

Lastly, judging by the end result you should try a less aggressive stretch, especially for the background. You can make a mask of the nebulous part, stretch it a lot and then use it as a luminance and saturation mask over a copy layer that has a neutralized, darker background.

There's lots of good signal in there, give it a go

[–] Linsensuppe@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I tried imaging with 30 seconds exposure recently on the Andromeda Galaxy and got this result with almost identical noise:

This was 315 subs at 30 seconds so around 2.5 hours of exposure.

So just increasing the exposure did not do a difference.

[–] Zer0_F0x@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Check each channel individually. Are the noise levels and shapes different for red, green and blue?

[–] Linsensuppe@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

In the final .fit the Red channel has, as expected, the fewest signal, but also the most noise in the dark areas of the image.

In the Raw subs I couldn't make out a channel with more noise than another.