this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
187 points (93.1% liked)

PC Gaming

13016 readers
727 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It’s not a dig against Nvidia, imo. All companies do this if they can. AMD siphoned off chips for enterprise from both cpu and gpu, because the premiums you can charge are so much higher.

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

$3200 for a 5090 or $22,000 for an H200

The choice is clear but Nvidia was created by the low-end and enthusiast GPU market....

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 21 points 4 days ago

True, but honor and loyalty are worthless to a corp.

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nvidia has almost never given a shit about the low end market. They haven’t made a good low end GPU in like 20 years.

[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 days ago

GTX 750 Ti was an absolute champ even for playing games at 1440p, and I would argue the GTX 1060/1050 were worth spiritual successors.

20 years ago you're looking at an MX440, over AGP if you were lucky.

In think they had many market segments covered, even with their Shield products.

It's clear that where they are going, tech enthusiasts/consumers won't sustain them, though. They will have to overextend themselves in Corpo bullshit, and either behind just another nightmare conglomerate, or die trying.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Maybe that's just something they say, maybe not, if not laws need to change, if so they need reining in.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

CEOs are obliged to act in the best interests of the company (as opposed to shareholders, which I stated previously). 99.99% of the time, that means increase market share, revenue and margins while cutting costs as close to the bone as possible.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Good news! Legality doesn’t mean much in the US anymore!

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Bad news! They're taking it so far the other way it's even worse!

[–] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

Ford just shut down the new lightning factory to make batteries for datacenters instead. It's just a great way to make sure prices keep going up. Create a scarcity and sell at extra markup.