this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
222 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

77923 readers
2340 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] eldebryn@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, I will concede to that. Supposedly LLMs help a lot in certain scientific research domains replacing tedious manual work.

The thing is, the prevalence of good vs bad scenarios are inversed between GenAI and aviation I would argue. Due to lack of legal regulation we see insane amounts of funding being given for the most greedy nefarious purposes, like the elimination of the working class or artists, privacy violations for the sake of control and literally weapons out of dystopian scifi.

It's really not the same.

[โ€“] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 1 points 11 hours ago

A lot of the AI you hear about in the scientific community is likely not an LLM. It might use bits of similar technology behind the scenes but they aren't using chatgpt to fold proteins or develop new weather models. That's the problem with lumping everything under "AI".

Unless you're talking writing the papers afterwards, but that's back into using LLMs for paperwork that every industry is discussing.