this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
184 points (99.5% liked)

Programming

26794 readers
106 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago (10 children)

Bad article, the number of issues aren't normalized to anything other than PRs. I expect AI authorized PRs to be somewhat bigger than a fully human authorized one.

[–] reabsorbthelight@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Ideally they'd compare time to write + time to fix. My experience is that if you use test driven development, LLM isn't too bad. No worse than an intern.

I think it comes down to who is using the LLM. I had a junior dev once "presumably" AI gen a ton of code (broken trash). Then to fix it, they wrapped each function in a try catch block that dropped the error. Unit tests were mocked out to the extent they didn't test anything.

When I use an LLM, I have tests and hard constraints on the LLM. It isn't good enough to do everything, but it can generate about 80% of a simple app

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 8 points 4 months ago

no worse than an intern

Why would I voluntarily subject myself to constantly working with a virtual intern. The only reason to work with someone of that level is because they grow into someone more useful

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)