this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2025
182 points (99.5% liked)

Politics

979 readers
442 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1-3, 6 & 7 No longer applicable

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

The Epstein Files: Trump, Trafficking, and the Unraveling Cover-Up

Info Video about techniques used in cults (and politics)

Bookmark Vault of Trump's First Term

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The FCC changed its website during a heated hearing with FCC chair Brendan Carr.

Carr was responding to questions from lawmakers about whether the agency was independent.

Carr told lawmakers "the FCC is not an independent agency" — within minutes, the FCC had scrubbed the word "independent" from its website, CNN reported.

ALSO READ: How the racketeer-in-chief found a dangerous outlet for his lethal disdain

CNN media analyst Sara Fischer said it only took the agency 25 minutes.

"So clearly they have made a decision to change their talking points around how they describe this agency," Fischer said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 61 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This administration has made it obvious that no institution, soverign or not, is safe from corruption. Authority and power will always be turned inward to serve and outward to punish as the inward group grows ever scant. This country cannot tear itself apart fast enough. Its just too bad we will be experiencing the wet dreams of oligarchs for the rest of our lives.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think it's obvious that you are on the brink of dictatorship - with all the repressive measures that go with it.

[–] Sanctus@anarchist.nexus 25 points 1 week ago

I think we are effectively already in a dictatorship

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not sure why everyone here thinks the oligarchs want this anarchy and destabilization. This is all bad for business and this AI bubble is going to be Great Depression 2.0.

Yeah, the oligarchs are kissing Trump's ass, but that's just good business, doesn't mean they agree with him. They just want a seat at the table, favors, etc.

I don't think it's that oligarchs want the US society to collapse, it's more that they're seen as reckless in their pursuit of getting that seat at the table of those in power. They're probably smart enough to know that eventually this path will lead to someone's destruction, but they're either confident or arrogant in their belief they'll be unaffected. Only time tell which it is

[–] Juice@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago

The system isnt rational, if something is good for business and good for workers, then it is a threat to the oligarchy. This is why a class analysis is so important.

During covid, wages went up, unemployment went down, profitability soared, business was pretty good in many sectors. What was the response? Raise interest rates, increase unemployment, drive down wages, increase prices.

Once you realise that unemployment and inflation are really one metric, it demonstrates how imprisoned the "free market" actually is. Good for business means little, only a society where workers own their time and produce is capable of being rational and fair

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

There's a level of wealth at which wealth loses meaning. Not in the "all things cost what I consider pocket change" sense, but in the "I'm so wealthy no one charges me money anymore" sense.
What matters then is consolidating that position, and establishing power, as opposed to wealth. It doesn't matter if the economy tanks if your position isn't based on economics. If the anarchy in question is people no longer listening to rules, that's a great time to put yourself in a powerful position that the rules say shouldn't exist. From that perspective, destabilization is just them pushing stuff they don't care about out of the way.