this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
169 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30941 readers
2167 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In interviews with Vanity Fair, Susie Wiles, the White House chief of staff, said President Trump “has an alcoholic’s personality,” called JD Vance a “conspiracy theorist” and concluded that Pam Bondi “completely whiffed” the early handling of the Epstein files.

Straight up mafia behavior

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

called JD Vance a "conspiracy theorist"

I'll say. The guy is still going with the "Biden gave us such a bad economy, and it will take a lot of work to fix it" bullshit narrative. That kind of conspiracy theory is truly unhinged; we could all see the data from last year and things were headed in the right direction on so many things - until these asshats took the helm.

https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook-pm/2025/12/16/vance-touts-an-a-economy-00693051

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The problem is that the target audience of this gaslighting will never bother to look at last year's data, and will just parrot whatever talking points are vomited up.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Yep. Even if they lived through both and experienced both and this is not even their first rodeo on the ups and downs of the economy. If Donvict or a proxy says something, by golly, it's true, even if part of them knows otherwise. Gas is now fifty cents a gallon and it was 5 dollars a gallon just last year! Taco is creating millions of jobs here when there were no jobs to be had just last year! We (well, at least white xtian cishet males) are going to deport and tariff our way to all be billionaires!

You could almost forgive someone too young and naive to know better; it's the people who have been around a while and seemingly have learned sweet fuckall in the process that are the most infuriating.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago

And even if they're shown the data, they will just choose to ignore it

[–] Stabbitha@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

My guy, that's not a conspiracy theory, because he doesn't actually believe it. It's called "lying".