Privacy

3453 readers

273 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

danielintempesta@programming.dev

An audit for AI? (piefed.social)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Libb@piefed.social to c/privacy@programming.dev

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Disclaimer: I'm a paid customer of Infomaniak's KSuite (a Swiss 'ethical' cloud offering). Next to the cloud storage and email and a few other extra, I recently noticed they have a 'privacy respecting' AI called Euria (which they also claims to be green-ish): https://www.infomaniak.com/en/euria

Overall, I'm very satisfied with their services but I'm also not much into using AI and don't plan to change that, and I was wondering: how does one make sure an AI is indeed privacy-respecting? I mean, is there an independent audit of some sort like there are for VPNs?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

if you can't host it offline, it's not privacy respecting.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I understand, thx.

[–] IceFoxX@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Offline ollama instance + alpaca. Then use a model that can also use the terminal or look things up on the web, etc.

Just because it's an offline instance doesn't mean it's privacy.