this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
921 points (99.1% liked)

Tumblr

292 readers
178 users here now

Welcome to /c/Tumblr

All the chaos of Tumblr, without actually going to Tumblr.

Rule 1: Be Civil, Not CursedThis isn’t your personal call-out post.

  • No harassment, dogpiling, or brigading
  • No bigotry (transphobia, racism, sexism, etc.)
  • Keep it fun and weird, not mean-spirited

Rule 2: No Forbidden PostsSome things belong in the drafts forever. That means:

  • No spam or scams
  • No porn or sexually explicit content
  • No illegal content (don’t make this a federal case)
  • NSFW screenshots must be properly tagged

If you see a post that breaks the rules, report it so the mods can handle it. Otherwise just reblog and relax.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And, to be fair, there was some corruption in unions. But, they could have rooted out that corruption and had a union that represented them. Instead they abandoned unions and embraced "rugged individualism".

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

there was some corruption in unions.

There's corruption almost everywhere. The unions only survive because there's corruption in the companies, so the union corruption is usually a lesser evil.

For what good the market is, as long as unions aren't illegal, they should always balance out the corporate greed.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, there's some corruption everywhere. But, for example, the teamsters union was massively infiltrated by organized crime. Unions are good, but like companies they need oversight.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Unions are good, but like companies they need oversight.

What we need then is a union union, which negotiates with the union to make sure they do their job and keep fees nominal, and if they refuse, it holds their dues. Of course, we can't have that for free, so .... unions all the way down?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or a government that oversees unions, just like they oversee clean water and safe medicine.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

(shaky stare at the US government at the moment)

I'm not sure that's a good idea....

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

The US government already oversees unions through the NLRB, but currently isn't able to do anything because Trump has removed the chair and not appointed a replacement. I don't think a broken NLRB is any worse than no NLRB at all.