this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
724 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

77742 readers
3024 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can't prove a negative, what you should look for is evidence that it works, without such evidence, there is no reason to believe it does.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Okay. I have that. Now what?

ETA: also, you can prove a negative, it's just often much harder. Since the person above said it doesn't work, the positive claim is theirs to justify. Whether it's hard or not is not my problem.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Okay. I have that. Now what?

Then you have your evidence, and your previous post is nonsensical.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 0 points 2 days ago

That's not how evidence works. If the original person has evidence that the software doesn't work, then we need to look at both sets of evidence and adjust our view accordingly.

It could very well be that the software works 90% of the time, but there could exist some outlying examples where it doesn't. And if they have those examples, I want to know about them.

[–] _cryptagion@anarchist.nexus 2 points 2 days ago

Last time I checked out Glaze, around the time it was announced, they refused to release any of their test data, and wouldn’t let people test images they had glazed. Idk why people wouldn’t find it super sus behavior, but either way it’s made moot by the fact that social media compresses images and ruins the glazing anyway, so it’s not really something people creating models worry about. When an artist shares their work, they’re nice enough to deglaze it for us.