this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
77 points (84.7% liked)
Programming
24117 readers
318 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This article / talk is quite illuminating. I’ve seen studies indicating that AI coding agents improve productivity by 15-20% in the aggregate, which tracks with my own experience. It’s a solid productivity boost when used correctly, clearly falling in the “centaur”category in my own experience at least. However, all the hate around it, my own included, stems from the “reverse-centaur” aspirations around it. The companies developing these tools aren’t in it to make a reasonable profit while delivering modest productivity gains. They are in it to spin a false narrative that these tools can replace 9/10 engineers in order to drive their own overly inflated valuations, knowing damn well this is not the case, but not caring because they don’t plan to be the ones holding the bag in the end (taxpayers will be the bag-holders when they get bailed out).