this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2025
25 points (100.0% liked)
196
18683 readers
140 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments

Does anyone have information on this?
Here's a screenshot
peta is know to create images of game IP to promote their agenda
This time they did it for Uma Musume, I'm not going to link their post as I don't want to give peta any promotion
https://umamusume.com/fan-createdguide/
Uma Musume has content creation guidelines for fan content that must be followed because it is their intellectual property which peta violated and they'll probably get sued for it if peta doesn't take it down
From what I recall of the image they created, they broke rules 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7
They've also got the Uma Musume fan base pissed off and it'll only be a matter of time before Cy Games hears of it if they haven't already.
Isn't this fair use of copyrighted material? I know Japan is kinda special on the rules of copyright, but PETA is not based from there so why should they care about the guidelines?
I guess this could also be a case for freedom of speech