this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2025
189 points (99.5% liked)

Videos

959 readers
87 users here now

Community for posting videos.

Yhteisö videoille.

It is recommended to put the video's length in title.

Example: "Really interesting video [6:09]"

Videon pituus suositellaan laitettavaksi otsikkoon.

Esimerkki: "Tosi kiinnostava video [6:09]"

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 9 points 1 week ago (9 children)

The thing about this con is that that's actually a viable product so... Why fake it? Are they too stupid to see useful that is hazardous work?

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its not though. They have had robots that can mirror humans for more than a decade. They don't use them for hazardous work for one REALLY simple reason:

They are worth more than humans.

Seriously. Anything that is so dangerous that it is prohibitively expensive to safely do with humans just gets exported to the third world where humans aren't worth anything. Why use million dollar robots when you can can just use brown guys in sandals for a nickel an hour instead?

Take auto battery recycling. That is a dangerous job that requires a lot of PPE and a ton of environmental mitigation efforts for the factory doing it. You have tons of vent hoods and lots of training and tons of inspections and oversight. Of course, that is only if you want to recycle batteries in a country that has workers rights, which is why no one recycles batteries in those countries. Instead, those batteries all get shipped to Africa where dudes break them apart with hammers in a field and cook out the metals in open pits and dump the acid into their water supply. Sure, those dudes are going to be dead in a 3 years, but who cares? Battery companies make a ton by getting the cheap recycled materials back and selling new "recycled" batteries.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

There's a difference between a viable product and the most profitable option even under capitalism.

A viable product is something with a customer. This doesn't have one.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't understand capitalism if you seriously think anything but the most profitable option is viable.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The existence of more than one brand of any given product would indicate one of us doesn't understand something.

Capitalism exists to funnel wealth upward through ownership of the means.

It isn't immediately and perfectly efficient at anything it does, creating a market of perfectly optimized and perfectly profitable goods like your comment accidentally implies.

load more comments (7 replies)