this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
25 points (96.3% liked)

Mobile Development

270 readers
1 users here now

Icon base by Skoll under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hey,

my phone plan (free plan) allows surfing the web for free but with very slow speeds between 32 kbps and 64 kbps. Safari would not load pages and just display website is not reachable due to a timeout. So, I came up with the idea to build a frugal text browser with some nice features that works with my phone plan.

I can disable loading images, media or web fonts. I can set an ad blocking DNS. I can even use LLMs with my slow connection. In settings you can set your own LLM base url and api key. In an emergency situation this is amazing!

I hope other people enjoy it as much as I do. It's completely free.

The app is called Narrow32, search in App Store :)

Btw: The community guided me to !imadethis@lemmy.zip

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I like seeing these solutions in the modern day. If you're looking to get even more use out of the limitations of your phone plan, you can take a page from computing history. Back when our mobile internet was 64kps-128kps we had these same challenges. I was doing remote server screen sharing on Windows with 19.2kps with VNC and could still perform important fixes in emergency situations.

Analogous to your situation though, a very clever approach was to use what was called a "clipping browser" such as Blazer for PalmOS.

It would work with a server with higher bandwidth to receive your web requests, fetch the contents to the clipping server where it would downscale the graphics and remove rich media elements (videos, animation). The result was a surprisingly fast loading graphical web experience. Keep in mind in those days a 320x240 screen was the limit, so you could downscale graphics quite a bit without losing any quality perceived by the end user.

You could probably accomplish this same thing with a modern Squid proxy server with a custom configuration.

[โ€“] q1p_@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

That sounds like a great idea. I'll consider it in the next few iterations. Maybe, I'll add it as an optional "self-hosting" feature.