this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
47 points (100.0% liked)
Advent Of Code
1154 readers
39 users here now
An unofficial home for the advent of code community on programming.dev! Other challenges are also welcome!
Advent of Code is an annual Advent calendar of small programming puzzles for a variety of skill sets and skill levels that can be solved in any programming language you like.
Everybody Codes is another collection of programming puzzles with seasonal events.
EC 2025
AoC 2025
Solution Threads
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
Rules/Guidelines
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep all content related to advent of code in some way
- If what youre posting relates to a day, put in brackets the year and then day number in front of the post title (e.g. [2024 Day 10])
- When an event is running, keep solutions in the solution megathread to avoid the community getting spammed with posts
Relevant Communities
Relevant Links
Credits
Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
console.log('Hello World')
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm far from sure I understand what you're doing in part 2, but I think maybe you hit the same logic bug I did (I solved it with a shameful if statement that I will have to fix later).
the idea is that crossing the zero is easy to detect by dividing the total dial movement by 100. I.e. if you cross from 120 to 90 you will detect that 120/100=1 changed to 90/100=0. The only case when this doesn’t work is when you stop at zero going in the negative direction, hence the extra if
The thing I couldn't comprehend was where 1000000000050 had come from.
ah that’s just because i needed rounding towards infinity and not towards zero. In other words i wanted -10/100 to be -1 and not zero. But i couldn’t figure it out on the spot, so i just made it never negative :)