this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
84 points (96.7% liked)

Legal News

635 readers
17 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

High Court challenge says law imposing ban is ‘grossly excessive’ and infringes on ‘constitutional right of freedom of political communication’

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GiveOver@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Surprised to see so many people on Lemmy in favour of social media. It's horrendous for everybody, adults and children alike. I don't think kids should be on there.

Usually for things like this, I'd be fine with parents handling it and controlling their own kids' access. But social media is too pervasive, you'd turn your kid into an outcast if they didn't have it when 96% of their peers did.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I would cheer if they banned social media for everyone, but since it's targeted their enforcement mechanism is privacy invasive age verification for everyone else. They couldn't care less about children if they tried, it's all about data collection. Pure and simple.

Lemmy is social media