this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
84 points (96.7% liked)

Legal News

634 readers
12 users here now

International and local legal news.


Basic rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Sensitive topics need NSFW flagSome cases involve sensitive topics. Use common sense and if you think that the content might trigger someone, post it under NSFW flag.
3. Instance rules applyAll lemmy.zip instance rules listed in the sidebar will be enforced.


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

High Court challenge says law imposing ban is ‘grossly excessive’ and infringes on ‘constitutional right of freedom of political communication’

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cypher@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hope this fails, social media has had horrible outcomes for young people.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

It’s an authoritarian power grab veiled as protecting the children, an ancient play from volumes scribed in clay.

Social Media, as it’s currently implemented, is an overwhelmingly negative to everyone, but banning it for anyone is a wilfully ignorant and lazy action.

The legitimate platforms have been gifted an abdication of responsibility to make their platforms safer, and the illegitimate ones have gained a greater potential audience.

The adult action would be to require the platforms prove they’re prioritising safety above profit, with embarrassingly transparent audit visibility; but this is the antithesis of how government and corporate entities are structured, and such measures are denigrated and dismissed.