this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
23 points (100.0% liked)
Game Development
5318 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to the game development community! This is a place to talk about and post anything related to the field of game development.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ok ok!
So... Caves of Qud.
That game seems very much like a MUD to me... what I think of as the general style and kind of gameplay... but it is not MultiUser, its a bit fancier than totally text based... but it does very much do a whole lot of basically 'deep world simulation'.
I did actually play a tiny bit of Everquest, waaaay back in the day, maybe thats where I'm remembering the 'graphical MUD' term from?
Christ, was that before RuneScape even existed?
Oi, lol.
Yep, a multiplayer Caves of Qud sounds about right! People don’t tend to make complex graphical UIs on top of MUDs, because the MUD creator is more worried about other things. But the clients often have mapping or other features.
MUDs are also more friendly to play for blind people than a lot of games since they’re based on text.
Incredibly, EverQuest came out two years before RuneScape!
If you’re curious about MUDs at all, my favorite one from the mid-nineties (Alter Aeon) is still being run by players who love the game and seem like good people. I still play sometimes, it provides a different kind of gaming experience than the games we’ve discussed.
The two main differences in what I consider a MUD vs a Dwarf Fortress / Caves of Qud would be that the mud is first person and has a textual description, where DF is third person and uses ASCII to represent things in space. So to describe a Dwarf next to a Goblin in a small room, DF would display:
While a mud would display: