this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
19 points (100.0% liked)
Australian Politics
1703 readers
5 users here now
A place to discuss Australia Politics.
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australia (general)
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Incremental? Incremental?
The Labor government are focusing on delivery, and they're delivering. Off the top of my head,
They're expanding security partnerships across the indo-pacific, with the Papua New Guinean one possibly being the most consequential since New Zealand. That deal is a huge step forward in that relationship.
They're pushing the economy into clean energy, rare earths, and climbing the value chain for things like green iron, fantastically complicated and long term projects that could set this nation up for generations to come. But thats supposedly incremental.
Rail transport sytems are being massivley upgraded in at least Perth, Melbourne, and Sydney. I know these are State led, but federal money will be being kicked in. The Budapest metro subway was opened in 1890 and is still being used. But trains here are tiny steps along the line of development, they'll hardly make a lasting impression.
Schultz focuses on immigration as the Coal-ition agenda setting, this will always be slightly uncomfortable for Labour, but right now? Its less so, they've responded to the perceived demands of a swathe of the public and have brought numbers down by tens of thousands, they have sound reasoning for the post COVID peak. And in that same time period the Coalition won't even commit to a number to argue is sustainable. Its a simple task to make the comparison of responsiveness in delivery versus another culture war. She also completely misses the media's role in the agenda setting.
Things are changing in this country in a big, big way. The angle this writer has taken made sense during Morrison's term or before, and even then i'd give Morrison a pass on this front due to COVID.
Incremental... pffft
And here am I thinking that cost of living qnd affordable housing were the top issues at the last election...
Yeah okay, i knew someone would call me out on that. I wrote that off the top of my head, cost of living and housing are definitely not in that list of big moves. I'd argue there are only incremental changes that can be made in those areas.
Did the writer even mention those herself? Seems like an oversight for the opinion piece. Because are the Coalition really driving the narrative on housing and cost of living? No, they've been absent since the election. I suppose my problem is the writer's narrative feels a bit shoehorned.
there's a lot of it going on, and once you're aware of it it's insulting how transparent it really is. I'm guessing they're trying to wedge on the vic elections again.
Yeah, sorry. My comment did come across as pissy.
You actually provided a good list of some of the positives Labor has provided, and i also wish more people paid attention to them.
Also, it occurred to me later that some of your points could well contribute to easing cost of living/housing. Some are more indirect than others, and some would payoff years off in the future, but every little thing helps. There's no silver bullet, you need a hail of pellets
Yeah, i've definitely got more time for the build up over time arguments. Most electorates it seems don't, but i hope theres enough goodwill and prosperity left in the Australian electorate to allow for solid, well made change to occur.