this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
133 points (97.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3494 readers
410 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No memes/pics of text

Post news related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ooli3@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If the guardian is own by some oligarch with real ties to Epstein, It would make sense to push article on people with weak tie to muddy the plot

[–] sorter_plainview@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Aah.. I see, I thought you were skeptical of the article. But you were actually expressing confidence in them.

[–] ooli3@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I conflicted. The article doesnt seems to find anything really bad in chomsky and epstein ties.. but then why does it exist then?

[–] sorter_plainview@lemmy.today 3 points 3 days ago

I think it is because Chomsky's name has been associated with Epstein before this, and when new information popped they reported what is in there. Mainly how Chomsky remained in contact even after knowing the issues of Epstein. I think they did a good job of reporting it properly, instead of sensationalising it, by just explaining the new stuff that is unsealed.