this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
742 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

9704 readers
2328 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It was supposed to be renewable energy, and it almost was until the fascists slammed the brakes.

Cheaper, more plentiful, and cleaner. Plus it doesn't take decades to increase capacity like nuclear does, and it won't become less safe and efficient due to climate change like nuclear is already starting to.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I hope you know there is a difference between nuclear fission and nuclear fusion, because your comment doesn't read like it.

Oops, misread as fission lol

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They both are “just two decades away”. One exists but takes that long to build a plant. The other is still under development and might exist by then.

Although the race for fusion is getting more exciting every day. We may actually see it happen! And it feels like soon!

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't talk as if it was ever funded, that's the whole point.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I always got a kick out of that graph and realistically it can apply to so many worthwhile projects we start but can’t commit to. For example: California High Speed Rail, or really any high speed rail In the US. Preventing climate change

My eye is immediately drawn to the “fusion: never” investment and how far we are below it.

But realistically for fusion whether that would have been true or not, we’ve made huge advancements in computation and modeling, lasers, materials, that just never could have happened on those timelines. Maybe the Tokamak would have worked but the stellarator or laser ignition never could have. While we still don’t have an answer, it might not be the tokamak

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

You are applying funding for research to funding for infrastructure? You either have no clue or are discussing in bad faith. Or both.