this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2025
78 points (98.8% liked)

Wild Feed

125 readers
93 users here now

A catch-all world journalism community for news, reports, blogs, editorials, and whatever.

Rules:

  1. Be cool to each other. Instance rules apply.

  2. All posts should link to a current* blog, article, editorial, listicle, research paper, or something that can be considered "news."

  3. Post title should be the article title or best fit.

  4. No misinformation or bigotry.

  5. Provide an archived link in the text body of the post for paywalled media.

Tags: Not required unless the post fits under one of the below categories.

[NSFW] and [Content Warning - x] — At your discretion.

[OLD - (year)] — For old but relevant articles. Use your best judgement.

[Conspiracy Tuesday] — Conspiracy theories/occult themes/cryptids/pseudoscience. On Tuesdays.

[E-mail required] — If an e-mail is needed to sign in.

A more serious community for Independent Journalism — https://lemmy.today/c/Independent_Media

Both communities were created with the goal of increasing media pluralism.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

Detailed by Scientific American, a team led by biologist Raffaela Lesch collected nearly 20,000 raccoon photos from users of iNaturalist, a social network/science project that allows its users to log and share scientific observations. Lesch and the team found that across the U.S., raccoons living in cities consistently had snouts about 3.5 percent shorter than those in rural areas. That might not sound like much, but it’s significant in evolutionary terms. It’s a sign of something called “domestication syndrome,” and it isn’t a random occurrence.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago

New housepet just dropped. Jokes aside this could be concerning if there were a marked drop in rural and wilderness racoons. Until then I see this as a sign of biodiversity overcoming our destructive ways.