this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
22 points (77.5% liked)

Hardware

4501 readers
230 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drkt@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 1 hour ago

https://toughsf.blogspot.com/2017/07/all-radiators.html

You are right in that it is simple, but it is simple in the worst way; you can't just shed heat in space. You have to convert it and radiate it away, which takes infrastructure and power. If the ISS had the compute capacity of a datacenter, the required radiators would engulf the station.

Also, datacenters are manned. Things break. In space, you need to either leave the earth's protective magnetosphere or do constant station-keeping because you're close to the atmosphere. If you leave the magnetosphere, you have to shield all of your electronics which adds a lot of weight and you can forget using the latest CPUs because they can't handle the high energy particle bombardment, even with shielding.