this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
16 points (94.4% liked)

Formula 1

10499 readers
217 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


πŸ“† F1 Calendar
🏁 FIA Documents
πŸ“Š F1 Pace


2025 Calendar

Location Date
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ United States 20-22 Nov
πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ Qatar 28-30 Nov
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ Abu Dhabi 05-07 Dec

Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone: drivers, lemmings etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.
  8. No duplicate posts, or posts of different news companies that say the same thing.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mr Justice Jay handed down his ruling from that hearing on Thursday. He allowed the matter to proceed and said Massa had a "real prospect of proving at trial" his case for damages.

However, to allow the declaration element of Massa's case to proceed "comes too close in my view to impinging on the right of the FIA to govern its own affairs", the judge said.

"Mr Massa is not entitled to claim declaratory relief for reputational or publicity reasons," he added.

"The present claim cannot of course rewrite the outcome of the 2008 drivers' world championship, but if declaratory relief along the lines sought were granted that is how Mr Massa would present his victory to the world and it is also how it would be perceived by the public."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] edcasting@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It sounds like the judge is saying that in essence, Massa could potentially prove negligence in the FIA not fulfilling their obligation to govern and enforce their rules by investigating the matter timely, but that he cannot ask to be declared champion on hypothetical grounds (ie, the assumption that the race would've been annulled and he would've become champion at the end of the season).

[–] lazycouchpotato@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] edcasting@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Seems to disagree with the BBC on the statute of limitations argument; they seem to think the judge took Massa's side on that point.